劍橋雅思9test4小作文

　　劍橋雅思9寫作Test4第二題屬于argumentative的立論型題，下面是小編整理的范文，歡迎閱讀!

　　劍橋雅思9寫作Test4Task1范文

　　The line graph indicates the general consumption ofAmerican energy from 1980 to 2030. Uses of petrol and oil and coal see a drastic increase of about 15 quadrillion unites during the span of 50 years, while the other four energies rise slightly with the unites of no more than 5 quadrillion.

　　To be specific, in 1980, the highest proportion of consumption was occupied by petrol and oil

　　staying at 35 quadrillion units, and it experienced some fluctuations during the first 15 years, then it had been keeping increasing since the year 1995. It is predictable that it will reach nearly 50 quadrillion units by the year of 2030.

　　Furthermore, uses of coal and natural gas remain the middle level on the whole, which stood at almost 15 and exactly 20 quadrillion units respectively in 1980. Separately, consumption of approximately had been rising smoothly and is expected to arrive at 30 quadrillion units in 2030, but the latter remains at, by and large, the same level (20 quadrillion units) with some instabilities.

　　Eventually, uses of nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower were the lowest, with the same units of being about 4 quadrillion collectively. It is noticeable that none of them changes tremendously during this half century.

　　劍橋雅思9寫作Test4Task2范文

　　It is undeniable that so many kinds of languages and dialects exit in the multi-cultural world, which causes some complex and embarrassed situations while communicating with people holding different languages. Some predict that if some lesser-known languages vanish, we may enjoy a much easier lingual atmosphere. Personally I think it is entirely wrong.

　　Admittedly, to eliminate some languages that have been used in some certain parts of the world will make people's communication easier. Namely, English and other international languages will bridge over the lingual barriers to some extent. However, if a language disappears, the

　　culture behind it will not exist then shortly. Besides, the living habits and traditions relying on those language features will also die out with the loss of a language itself.

　　When it comes to the reasons for my disagreement, two aspects should be listed: for one thing, as mentioned above, language is no more than a way of communication. It is more likely to be a better symbol on special occasions, like some famous directors will thank all his helpers in English on stage when he is awarded by Oscar, but he will definitely thank his homeland in his native language at last, which represents a national pride vividly. For another, if it is possible to remove some lesser-known languages, some substitution will be used as English and French recently. However, the problem is the translation is not so perfect to transfer each cultural meaning and indication from a native surrounding to a western lingual way. The missing translation will lead to the loss of cultural diversity subconsciously.

　　In sum, some lesser-known languages should not be widely used for the globalization, but the preservation of those cultural-valued legacies should never stop until the extinction of the human beings.

【劍橋雅思9test4小作文】相關(guān)文章：

劍橋雅思小作文范文05-23

劍橋雅思作文范文10-21

劍橋雅思評分標準08-17

劍橋雅思6test3小作文（通用35篇）04-25

劍橋雅思9作文范文匯總08-12

劍橋雅思作文范文（通用29篇）08-20

劍橋雅思閱讀長難句解析09-26

劍橋雅思聽力評分標準08-08

劍橋雅思英語長難句分析08-03

劍橋雅思寫作Task2作文范文09-13